Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $100.0 vs $406.45
- Up to 65% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $0.71 vs $2.05 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 40% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 198 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
141
71.21212121212122%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
34.63414634146342%
Price, $
$406.45
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $406.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |