Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 1329 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-6350 - $48.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6350 - $0.42 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361363 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |