Buy on Amazon
$48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2914 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $48.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.07 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Core i7-860 - 705 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
673
95.46099290780143%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Intel OEM BV80605001908AK Core i7-860 Processor 2.8GHz 2.5GT/s 8MB LGA 1156 CPU OEM
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361500 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
705
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
43.75000000000001%
Price, $
$109.99
43%
FPS Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
