Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $64.03 vs $147.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-13100 - $0.65 vs $1.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 29% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8150 - 126 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
98
77.77777777777779%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361298 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
55.55555555555556%
Price, $
$147.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |