Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $64.03 vs $150.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-11600 - $0.39 vs $0.64 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 41% better in Dota 2 than FX-8150 - 234 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
166
70.94017094017094%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361270 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
60.9375%
Price, $
$150
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |