Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $47.98 vs $66.82
- Up to 27% better value when playing Stray than Core i3-7100T - $0.27 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than FX-8300 - 182 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
176
96.7032967032967%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359815 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
72.97297297297298%
Price, $
$66.82
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |