Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 3094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700G - $102.02 vs $169.26
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 5700G - $0.49 vs $0.65 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield V than FX-8320 - 259 vs 208 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
80.3088803088803%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
75.38461538461539%
Price, $
$169.26
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $169.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Cezanne |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |