Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3466 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $102.02 vs $134.99
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 55% better in Starfield than FX-8320 - 68 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Starfield than FX-8320 - $1.99 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
44
64.70588235294117%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
85.77586206896552%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349452 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.99
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $134.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349453 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |