Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $102.02 vs $140.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-8400 - $2.32 vs $2.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than FX-8320 - 57 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
44
77.19298245614034%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349452 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
94.30894308943088%
Price, $
$140
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349453 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |