Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2740 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $102.02 vs $150.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.49 vs $0.6 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than FX-8320 - 248 vs 208 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
83.87096774193549%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349448 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
81.66666666666667%
Price, $
$150
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |