Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9590 is 43 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 66% cheaper than FX-9590 - $100.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 66% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-9590 - $0.76 vs $2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
34.234234234234236%
Price, $
$298.02
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348849 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
132
98.50746268656717%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348849 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |