Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1750 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than FX-6350 - 696 vs 674 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $100.0 vs $130.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.15 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
696
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
78.94736842105263%
Price, $
$130
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360834 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
674
96.83908045977012%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |