Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $80.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 56% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - $0.41 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Ryzen 3 3200G - 214 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
196
91.58878504672897%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360805 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
44.08602150537634%
Price, $
$198.9
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360804 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
48.12442817932296%
Multi-Core
3013
35.120643431635386%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |