Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 252 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $155.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 80% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.87 vs $14.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2600 - 55 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
54
98.18181818181819%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349819 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.34/FPS
20.0139470013947%
Price, $
$788.88
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349819 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
98.37745516652434%
Multi-Core
4841
64.21276031303887%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |