Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 456 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 22% cheaper than Pentium G3258 - $39.95 vs $51.36
- Up to 21% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G3258 - $0.34 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3258 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 120 vs 119 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
99.16666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349763 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
79.06976744186048%
Price, $
$51.36
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349763 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
94.77977161500816%
Multi-Core
992
92.36499068901304%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |