Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 456 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - $39.95 vs $53.5
- Up to 17% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-4690K - $0.34 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 51 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 130 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
91.53846153846153%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349757 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
82.92682926829269%
Price, $
$53.5
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $53.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
45.14374514374514%
Multi-Core
992
27.320297438722115%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 88 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |