Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 945 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 20% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $39.95 vs $50.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Celeron G4900 - $0.21 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G3900 - 190 vs 189 FPS
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
189
99.47368421052632%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349762 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
80.76923076923076%
Price, $
$50
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349762 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
94.31818181818183%
Multi-Core
992
94.38629876308278%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |