Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 821 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $39.95 vs $55.26
- Up to 24% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4670S - $0.26 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - 163 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
156
95.70552147239265%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349703 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
76.47058823529412%
Price, $
$55.26
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
50.47784535186794%
Multi-Core
992
30.48555623847572%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |