Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-6600 - $39.95 vs $74.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-6600 - $0.24 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Celeron G3900 - 172 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
95.34883720930233%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349448 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
55.81395348837209%
Price, $
$74
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
45.178849144634526%
Multi-Core
992
27.927927927927925%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |