Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $39.95 vs $80.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-3770 - $0.87 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Celeron G3900 - 47 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
46
97.87234042553192%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
51.17647058823529%
Price, $
$80
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
86.58718330849479%
Multi-Core
992
43.14919530230535%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |