Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $39.95 vs $80.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.19 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 227 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
92.95154185022027%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349462 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
227
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
54.28571428571429%
Price, $
$80
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
55.22813688212928%
Multi-Core
992
32.923996017258546%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |