Buy on Amazon
$39.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i3-3220 - 164 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $39.95 vs $79.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-3220 - $0.24 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349457 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349457 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
