Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570T is 821 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-4570T - $39.95 vs $90.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-4570T - $0.87 vs $1.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Celeron G3900 - 52 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
46
88.46153846153845%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349592 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
50.28901734104046%
Price, $
$90
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349594 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4570T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |