Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 1408 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - $39.95 vs $82.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-2700K - $0.36 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 113 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
112
99.11504424778761%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349458 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
49.31506849315068%
Price, $
$82
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349458 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |