Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 978 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 126 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $48.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 54% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.38 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
95.23809523809523%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
46.34146341463415%
Price, $
$98.02
48%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349759 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349761 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
58.40537944284342%
Multi-Core
1043
50.95261358085003%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |