Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2053 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-2405S - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-2405S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 53% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $46.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 52% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.39 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
47.5609756097561%
Price, $
$98.02
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349763 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
119
99.16666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349763 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | No |