Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-2100 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 50% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $49.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 49% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.42 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
51.21951219512195%
Price, $
$98.02
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349764 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
76.64473684210526%
Multi-Core
954
91.46692233940557%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |