Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1129 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1820 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 53% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $46.41 vs $98.02
- Up to 52% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.39 vs $0.82 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
47.5609756097561%
Price, $
$98.02
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349756 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
80.75657894736842%
Multi-Core
825
79.09875359539788%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |