Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $98.02 vs $591.89
- Up to 79% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.88 vs $4.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 24% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 139 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
80.57553956834532%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349143 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.26/FPS
20.657276995305164%
Price, $
$591.89
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
20.83618917066484%
Multi-Core
1043
5.312484082921612%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |