Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $98.02 vs $593.77
- Up to 80% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600KF - $0.88 vs $4.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 137 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
81.75182481751825%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349162 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
20.323325635103924%
Price, $
$593.77
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
22.13323625773571%
Multi-Core
1043
6.766136879662667%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |