Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $98.02 vs $567.98
- Up to 77% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-13900 - $0.78 vs $3.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 36% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G3930 - 170 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
125
73.52941176470588%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.34/FPS
23.353293413173652%
Price, $
$567.98
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
22.402358142962417%
Multi-Core
1043
6.349689516619993%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |