Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 1311 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $98.02 vs $498.95
- Up to 80% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4765T - $0.63 vs $3.12 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3930 - 160 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
156
97.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
20.192307692307693%
Price, $
$498.95
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
66.66666666666666%
Multi-Core
1043
35.82961181724493%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |