Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1056 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $98.02 vs $515.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.8 vs $3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 34% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G3930 - 165 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
123
74.54545454545455%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
25.641025641025646%
Price, $
$515
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
35.68075117370892%
Multi-Core
1043
9.75130890052356%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |