Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 855 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $98.02 vs $549.95
- Up to 80% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i7-5930K - $0.8 vs $4.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 10% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G3930 - 135 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
123
91.11111111111111%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.07/FPS
19.656019656019655%
Price, $
$549.95
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
52.595155709342556%
Multi-Core
1043
19.032846715328468%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |