Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 654 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $98.02 vs $545.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-9800X - $0.78 vs $3.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G3930 - 141 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
125
88.65248226950354%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.87/FPS
20.155038759689923%
Price, $
$545
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
44.44444444444444%
Multi-Core
1043
14.18468652250782%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |