Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2186 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $98.02 vs $390.81
- Up to 75% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-2500K - $0.51 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
24.87804878048781%
Price, $
$390.81
25%
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
94.11764705882352%
Multi-Core
1043
54.29463820926601%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |