Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $219.95 vs $389.88
- Up to 25% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700F - $0.76 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 33% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4150T - 384 vs 289 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
289
75.26041666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361295 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
384
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
74.50980392156863%
Price, $
$389.88
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
55.261459005810195%
Multi-Core
1742
27.845268542199484%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |