Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 978 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3930 - 116 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $98.02 vs $219.95
- Up to 54% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-4150T - $0.88 vs $1.9 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
46.31578947368421%
Price, $
$219.95
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361212 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
111
95.6896551724138%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
71.02803738317756%
Multi-Core
1043
59.87370838117106%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |