Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 367 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $100.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 54% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-4150T - $0.53 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
45.6896551724138%
Price, $
$219.95
45%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361044 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |