Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 148 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $133.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.9 vs $5.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
137
92.56756756756756%
Value, $/FPS
$5.76/FPS
15.625%
Price, $
$788.88
16%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
69.45432977461448%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |