Buy on Amazon
$69
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 144 days older than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8300 - 121 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - $47.98 vs $69.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3570 - $0.41 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
71.9298245614035%
Price, $
$69
69%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-3570 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53570
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349874 minutes ago
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
97.52066115702479%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W FX-8300 Bulk Package
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349874 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
