Buy on Amazon
$69
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 1187 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G3900 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - $39.95 vs $69.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i5-3570 - $0.21 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 51 vs 77 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
58.333333333333336%
Price, $
$69
57%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-3570 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53570
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349871 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
189
99.47368421052632%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349871 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
88.5670731707317%
Multi-Core
992
51.559251559251564%
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
