Buy on Amazon
$69
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 2132 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 1% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G4900 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - $50.0 vs $69.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i5-3570 - $0.25 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 54 vs 77 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
73.52941176470587%
Price, $
$69
72%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-3570 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53570
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349883 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
99.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349883 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
93.90243902439023%
Multi-Core
1051
54.62577962577962%
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
