Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4440 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4440 is 730 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than Celeron G3900 - 698 vs 678 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-4440 - $39.95 vs $131.71
- Up to 68% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-4440 - $0.06 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
698
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
31.57894736842105%
Price, $
$131.71
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $131.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361031 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
678
97.134670487106%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
56.24394966118103%
Multi-Core
992
34.18332184700207%
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |