Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T and the cheaper Celeron G3900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $39.95 vs $99.9
- Up to 56% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-6700T - $0.19 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 231 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
91.34199134199135%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349334 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
44.18604651162791%
Price, $
$99.9
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.112426035502956%
Multi-Core
992
27.81828379136287%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |