Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2361 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Core i5-760 - 46 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $98.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-760 - $2.13 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
44
95.65217391304348%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
93.83259911894272%
Price, $
$100
98%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358269 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
46
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |