Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 43% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - 360 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $39.95 vs $112.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-9400F - $0.16 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
51.61290322580645%
Price, $
$112
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361302 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
252
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
42.16255442670537%
Multi-Core
992
20.521307405875053%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |