Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3900 - 191 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $39.95 vs $225.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-10700F - $0.28 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
23.728813559322038%
Price, $
$225.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361903 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
75.91623036649214%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361902 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
36.04218362282878%
Multi-Core
992
13.718711104964735%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |