Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930 - 191 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $98.02 vs $225.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.57 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
48.30508474576271%
Price, $
$225.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
89.52879581151832%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348791 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
37.71712158808933%
Multi-Core
1043
14.42400774443369%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |