Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 92% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1820 - 461 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $46.41 vs $202.98
- Up to 57% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-11700F - $0.19 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
461
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
43.18181818181818%
Price, $
$202.98
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $202.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361474 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
240
52.060737527114966%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361473 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
23.369823893384105%
Multi-Core
825
9.385665529010238%
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |